<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Danger! Do not implement SharePoint in your Organization!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.endusersharepoint.com/2009/09/10/danger-do-not-implement-sharepoint-in-your-organization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.endusersharepoint.com/2009/09/10/danger-do-not-implement-sharepoint-in-your-organization/</link>
	<description>The SharePoint &#34;How-To&#34; Online Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:30:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danny Boulanger</title>
		<link>http://www.endusersharepoint.com/2009/09/10/danger-do-not-implement-sharepoint-in-your-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-17195</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Boulanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endusersharepoint.com/?p=1933#comment-17195</guid>
		<description>Fred, great article,

Since 1995, I have been implementing ECM with Documentum and LiveLink.  I am not surprise that we still have to repeat the same thing, over and over.  Human nature are really, and I mean, really excited to implement technology.  They forget that people are looking at a business solutions and not feature.  We build product on top of SharePoint, but still there is work to be done.  
-Find the Business Requirements
-Transfert it in to functionnal requirements
-Solution Architecture
-Information Architecture
-Build, Deploy, Trainning, etc...

Too many technical people are trying to be everything: developper, information architect, designer, bussiness analyst, product designer, etc.

SharePoint is like any other technology, you must follow a methodology and hire real expert and at least be certified on the technology.

Danny Boulanger, Alcero</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred, great article,</p>
<p>Since 1995, I have been implementing ECM with Documentum and LiveLink.  I am not surprise that we still have to repeat the same thing, over and over.  Human nature are really, and I mean, really excited to implement technology.  They forget that people are looking at a business solutions and not feature.  We build product on top of SharePoint, but still there is work to be done.<br />
-Find the Business Requirements<br />
-Transfert it in to functionnal requirements<br />
-Solution Architecture<br />
-Information Architecture<br />
-Build, Deploy, Trainning, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Too many technical people are trying to be everything: developper, information architect, designer, bussiness analyst, product designer, etc.</p>
<p>SharePoint is like any other technology, you must follow a methodology and hire real expert and at least be certified on the technology.</p>
<p>Danny Boulanger, Alcero</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
